All Blogs

	Cat_id	id	Subject	Body	Date	AuthorName	BlogImage	SEOImage	BodyText	Keywords	Description	cnt	cat	VisitorCount	Pagename
Page 1 of 5  Item 1 to 10 of 45
GST Audit Report u/s 65 (Form ADT-02) Cannot Be Revised U/S 108 of the GST Act CA SOHRABH JINDAL “GST Audit Report u/s 65 (Form ADT-02) Cannot Be Revised U/S 108 of the GST Act: Karnataka High Court in NL Tile Art Pvt Ltd”.​ The Karnataka High Court has held that a GST audit report cannot be re ........ View More 15/01/2026 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 42
The reassessment u/s 147 is not permissible in case of person other than the searched person, when t ........ CA SOHRABH JINDAL The reassessment u/s 147 is not permissible in case of person other than the searched person, when the incriminating material found during search belongs to the other person and the AO of searched per ........ View More 10/01/2026 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 70
Supreme Court Affirms: Application of Mind by Assessing Officer is Must Even After 1-4-2021 – Reasse ........ CA SOHRABH JINDAL Supreme Court Upholds Gujarat High Court's Landmark Ruling on Reassessment Based on Audit Objections: Critical Protection for Taxpayers The Supreme Court's Landmark Affirmation: Setting Boundaries o ........ View More 18/12/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 158
Assessment under s.153A quashed for invalid service of notice to a person in Judicial Custody and me ........ CA SOHRABH JINDAL Assessment under s.153A quashed for invalid service of notice to a person in Judicial Custody and mechanical s.153D approval and held that approval u/s 153D is not just a ritual formality, entire proc ........ View More 08/12/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 209
GST Can not be demanded from the Purchasing Dealer for bonafide purchases of Goods even in case of R ........ CA SOHRABH JINDAL GST Can not be demanded from the Purchasing Dealer for bonafide purchases of Goods even in case of Registration of the Supplier is cancelled from Retrospective effect- Another Case Decided by Hon'ble ........ View More 08/12/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 294
GST PENALTY OF 285 CRORE AGAINST THE GST CONSULTANT- DELHI HIGH COURT CA SOHRABH JINDAL 🚨 Landmark Delhi HC Judgment in GST Penalty Case: A Cautionary Tale for Tax Consultants 🧾 Case: Bhupender Kumar vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Ors. Court: Delhi High ........ View More 01/08/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 701
Combined GST SCNs and Orders for Multiple Years Held Invalid: A Landmark Madras High Court Ruling CA SOHRABH JINDAL Combined GST SCNs and Orders for Multiple Years Held Invalid: A Landmark Madras High Court Ruling In a significant judgment that will have far-reaching implications for GST administration and litig ........ View More 31/07/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 641
Relief for TDS / TCS Excess demands due to non linking of PAN Aadhaar CA SOHRABH JINDAL *TDS / TCS Excess demands due to non linking of PAN Aadhaar* *CBDT Circular No. 9/2025 dated 21-07-2025: Relief on Higher TDS/TCS for Inoperative PANs* The CBDT has provided major relief regardin ........ View More 22/07/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 657
Delhi GST Department Makes Virtual Hearings Mandatory CA SOHRABH JINDAL Delhi GST Department Makes Virtual Hearings Mandatory: What Taxpayers Need to Know The Delhi GST Department has taken a significant step towards digitizing tax administration by issuing a circular o ........ View More 14/06/2025 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 843
The Bombay High Court has imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) ........ CA SOHRABH JINDAL The Bombay High Court has imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) for failing to adhere to a binding judgement in the case of Hexaware Technologies Limited vs. Assis ........ View More 28/09/2024 | 0 comments | Visitor's Count: 1170